|
|
Home » Developing U++ » U++ Developers corner » What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ?
Re: What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ? [message #46840 is a reply to message #46818] |
Fri, 26 August 2016 13:42 |
cbpporter
Messages: 1401 Registered: September 2007
|
Ultimate Contributor |
|
|
Quote:Yup, still can't compile anything, not even the command line application.
Reverted to pre C++11x versions.
Scratch that. After deleting all previous version and a fresh install, I managed to get something that only has a couple of different error for the command line project, so might get it to compile.
One is:
BuildMethod.cpp(24): error C2676: binary '<<=': 'Upp::String' does not define this operator or a conversion to a type acceptable t
o the predefined operator
The other one is:
error C2280: 'Block::Block(const Block &)': attempting to reference a deleted function
Block is:
class Block: Moveable<Block> {
public:
WithDeepCopy<VectorMap<String, Variable>> Vars;
int Temps;
Block() {
Temps = 0;
}
rval_default(Block);
};
So how does one handle this with the new C++?
Anyway, these two problems are fixable.
But I think it is fair to say that the C++ 11x integration did not work at all well. Almost killed U++ for me.
[Updated on: Fri, 26 August 2016 13:59] Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
|
What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ?
|
|
|
Re: What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ?
By: Novo on Sat, 16 July 2016 17:04
|
|
|
Re: What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ?
|
|
|
Re: What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ?
By: Klugier on Sat, 16 July 2016 21:30
|
|
|
Re: What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ?
|
|
|
Re: What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ?
By: Klugier on Sat, 16 July 2016 23:37
|
|
|
Re: What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ?
By: mr_ped on Sun, 17 July 2016 12:36
|
|
|
Re: What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ?
By: mirek on Thu, 21 July 2016 07:22
|
|
|
Re: What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ?
By: kov_serg on Sun, 14 August 2016 21:22
|
|
|
Re: What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ?
|
|
|
Re: What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ?
By: mirek on Fri, 02 September 2016 09:24
|
|
|
Re: What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ?
By: cbpporter on Tue, 06 September 2016 09:04
|
|
|
Re: What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ?
By: mr_ped on Wed, 17 August 2016 10:09
|
|
|
Re: What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ?
|
|
|
Re: What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ?
|
|
|
Re: What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ?
|
|
|
Re: What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ?
|
|
|
Re: What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ?
By: mirek on Wed, 31 August 2016 19:29
|
|
|
Re: What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ?
By: mirek on Wed, 31 August 2016 19:34
|
|
|
Re: What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ?
|
|
|
Re: What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ?
By: mirek on Wed, 19 April 2017 15:19
|
|
|
Re: What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ?
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Mon Apr 29 10:58:49 CEST 2024
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01949 seconds
|
|
|