Home » Developing U++ » U++ Developers corner » What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ?
Re: What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ? [message #47887 is a reply to message #46705] |
Tue, 18 April 2017 21:45 |
aftershock
Messages: 143 Registered: May 2008
|
Experienced Member |
|
|
I have similar problem
I have current stable IDE..(version 10804). Windows....VIsual studio 17 64 bit
Why is it calling a copy constructor at map.h 212
threads[free_index].Run ( THISBACK5 ( execute_bot_in_background, bot1, a, params, result_mode, stat_group_id ) );
main.cpp(1502): error C2280: 'Upp::VectorMap<Upp::String,double>::VectorMap(const Upp::VectorMap<Upp::String,double> &)': attempting to reference
a deleted function
d:\upp\uppsrc\core\Map.h(212): note: compiler has generated 'Upp::VectorMap<Upp::String,double>::VectorMap' here
d:\upp\uppsrc\core\Map.h(212): note: 'Upp::VectorMap<Upp::String,double>::VectorMap(const Upp::VectorMap<Upp::String,double> &)': function was implicitly deleted becau
se a base class invokes a deleted or inaccessible function 'Upp::AMap<K,T,Upp::Vector<T>>::AMap(const Upp::AMap<K,T,Upp::Vector<T>> &)'
with
[
K=Upp::String,
T=double
]
d:\upp\uppsrc\core\Map.h(190): note: 'Upp::AMap<K,T,Upp::Vector<T>>::AMap(const Upp::AMap<K,T,Upp::Vector<T>> &)': function was implicitly deleted because a data membe
r invokes a deleted or inaccessible function 'Upp::Index<Upp::String>::Index(const Upp::Index<Upp::String> &)'
with
[
K=Upp::String,
T=double
]
d:\upp\uppsrc\core\Index.h(210): note: 'Upp::Index<Upp::String>::Index(const Upp::Index<Upp::String> &)': function was implicitly deleted because 'Upp::Index<Upp::Stri
ng>' has a user-defined move constructor
]
[Updated on: Tue, 18 April 2017 21:59] by Moderator Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
|
What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ?
|
|
|
Re: What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ?
By: Novo on Sat, 16 July 2016 17:04
|
|
|
Re: What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ?
|
|
|
Re: What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ?
By: Klugier on Sat, 16 July 2016 21:30
|
|
|
Re: What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ?
|
|
|
Re: What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ?
By: Klugier on Sat, 16 July 2016 23:37
|
|
|
Re: What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ?
By: mr_ped on Sun, 17 July 2016 12:36
|
|
|
Re: What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ?
By: mirek on Thu, 21 July 2016 07:22
|
|
|
Re: What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ?
By: kov_serg on Sun, 14 August 2016 21:22
|
|
|
Re: What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ?
|
|
|
Re: What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ?
By: mirek on Fri, 02 September 2016 09:24
|
|
|
Re: What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ?
By: cbpporter on Tue, 06 September 2016 09:04
|
|
|
Re: What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ?
By: mr_ped on Wed, 17 August 2016 10:09
|
|
|
Re: What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ?
|
|
|
Re: What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ?
|
|
|
Re: What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ?
|
|
|
Re: What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ?
|
|
|
Re: What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ?
By: mirek on Wed, 31 August 2016 19:29
|
|
|
Re: What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ?
By: mirek on Wed, 31 August 2016 19:34
|
|
|
Re: What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ?
|
|
|
Re: What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ?
By: mirek on Wed, 19 April 2017 15:19
|
|
|
Re: What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ?
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Mon Apr 29 16:59:38 CEST 2024
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.03008 seconds
|