Overview
Examples
Screenshots
Comparisons
Applications
Download
Documentation
Tutorials
Bazaar
Status & Roadmap
FAQ
Authors & License
Forums
Funding Ultimate++
Search on this site
Search in forums












SourceForge.net Logo
Home » Developing U++ » U++ Developers corner » What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ?
Re: What is the highest version of U++ that does not require C++11 ? [message #47889 is a reply to message #47887] Wed, 19 April 2017 15:19 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
mirek is currently offline  mirek
Messages: 13975
Registered: November 2005
Ultimate Member
aftershock wrote on Tue, 18 April 2017 21:45
I have similar problem
I have current stable IDE..(version 10804). Windows....VIsual studio 17 64 bit
Why is it calling a copy constructor at map.h 212

threads[free_index].Run ( THISBACK5 ( execute_bot_in_background, bot1, a, params, result_mode, stat_group_id ) );

main.cpp(1502): error C2280: 'Upp::VectorMap<Upp::String,double>::VectorMap(const Upp::VectorMap<Upp::String,double> &)': attempting to reference 
    a deleted function
d:\upp\uppsrc\core\Map.h(212): note: compiler has generated 'Upp::VectorMap<Upp::String,double>::VectorMap' here
d:\upp\uppsrc\core\Map.h(212): note: 'Upp::VectorMap<Upp::String,double>::VectorMap(const Upp::VectorMap<Upp::String,double> &)': function was implicitly deleted becau
    se a base class invokes a deleted or inaccessible function 'Upp::AMap<K,T,Upp::Vector<T>>::AMap(const Upp::AMap<K,T,Upp::Vector<T>> &)'
        with
        [
            K=Upp::String,
            T=double
        ]
d:\upp\uppsrc\core\Map.h(190): note: 'Upp::AMap<K,T,Upp::Vector<T>>::AMap(const Upp::AMap<K,T,Upp::Vector<T>> &)': function was implicitly deleted because a data membe
    r invokes a deleted or inaccessible function 'Upp::Index<Upp::String>::Index(const Upp::Index<Upp::String> &)'
        with
        [
            K=Upp::String,
            T=double
        ]
d:\upp\uppsrc\core\Index.h(210): note: 'Upp::Index<Upp::String>::Index(const Upp::Index<Upp::String> &)': function was implicitly deleted because 'Upp::Index<Upp::Stri
    ng>' has a user-defined move constructor
        ]


Hard to say without context. However, it looks like you are passing VectorMap as parameter to THISBACK5 - that is not possible. Legacy U++ (pre C++11) was tricky as it has silently used pick constructor here.

The situation is really only resolved with current U++, lamdas and C++14.

http://www.ultimatepp.org/srcdoc$Core$Tutorial$en-us.html
chapter 5.2
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Use zlib inside another library
Next Topic: U++ in a computer cluster
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Mon Apr 29 10:39:13 CEST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01890 seconds