Home » Developing U++ » U++ Developers corner » Possible solution of "icpp problem"
Re: Possible solution of "icpp problem" [message #46853 is a reply to message #46851] |
Sun, 28 August 2016 17:41 |
|
mirek
Messages: 13975 Registered: November 2005
|
Ultimate Member |
|
|
Mindtraveller wrote on Sun, 28 August 2016 10:07First of all, let's think do we really need to keep icpp-compatibility at all. Or it is possible to forget about them once and for all.
Talking about the solution proposed (to inject registration calls with header - if I understand it correctly), I think this is possible way, but it has one [possible] issue with initialization order. We can't predict the way headers are included and we can't predict the sequence of initialization.
That is non-issue. We cannot predict the order now as well - the code has to written in a way that order does not matter. Which actually is not that hard.
Quote:
I always wondered why plugins are not initialized inside CONSOLE_APP_MAIN/GUI_APP_MAIN)
That is certainly possible, but complicates client code contract. You will have to start to remember that package needs to be registered.
Quote:
with auto-initialization classes
The link you have posted suggests highly specialized case of what we need to do IMO. Anyway, the problem with code overhead mentioned in the article is real, it is something I will have yet to think about... (and yet again, icpp seems to be the superior solution to that...)
Mirek
[Updated on: Sun, 28 August 2016 17:41] Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
|
Possible solution of "icpp problem"
By: mirek on Sat, 27 August 2016 16:09
|
|
|
Re: Possible solution of "icpp problem"
|
|
|
Re: Possible solution of "icpp problem"
|
|
|
Re: Possible solution of "icpp problem"
By: mirek on Sun, 28 August 2016 17:49
|
|
|
Re: Possible solution of "icpp problem"
|
|
|
Re: Possible solution of "icpp problem"
|
|
|
Re: Possible solution of "icpp problem"
By: koldo on Mon, 29 August 2016 09:18
|
|
|
Re: Possible solution of "icpp problem"
By: mirek on Thu, 15 September 2016 09:14
|
|
|
Re: Possible solution of "icpp problem"
By: mirek on Sun, 28 August 2016 17:41
|
|
|
Re: Possible solution of "icpp problem"
By: kov_serg on Thu, 22 September 2016 16:44
|
|
|
Re: Possible solution of "icpp problem"
By: mirek on Thu, 22 September 2016 17:02
|
|
|
Re: Possible solution of "icpp problem"
By: kov_serg on Fri, 23 September 2016 00:32
|
|
|
Re: Possible solution of "icpp problem"
By: mirek on Fri, 23 September 2016 09:26
|
|
|
Re: Possible solution of "icpp problem"
By: mr_ped on Sun, 25 September 2016 04:16
|
|
|
Re: Possible solution of "icpp problem"
By: kov_serg on Mon, 26 September 2016 17:05
|
|
|
Re: Possible solution of "icpp problem"
By: mirek on Mon, 26 September 2016 17:43
|
|
|
Re: Possible solution of "icpp problem"
By: kov_serg on Mon, 26 September 2016 18:35
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Mon Apr 29 10:18:11 CEST 2024
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.03313 seconds
|