U++ forum: Welcome to the forum

Status & Roadmap

Authors & License

Funding Ultimate++

Search on this site

Search in forums

Home » Community » U++ community news and announcements » U++ 2017 beta

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Return to the default flat view

Create a new topic

Submit Reply

Re: U++ 2017 beta [message #47311 is a reply to message #47309]

Wed, 04 January 2017 01:04

amrein is currently offline

amrein
Messages: 278
Registered: August 2008
Location: France

Experienced Member

The previous version has never broke in years! When a snapshot didn't compile, is was because of unmatched gcc or library version or because of source code errors.
To be clear, running 'make' gave the same error.

The difficult part for most people was to run the long rpmbuild command with its parameters. Now it's really easy to use: on all rpm based linux distributions yuu just run 'rpmbuild -ta snapshot.tar.gz'.

On Fedora rpmbuild will automatically use g++ and on other linux distributions it will use clang++ (to prevent the use of gcc < 4.9.0).

I modified the POSIX/X11 installation guide with topic++ so now most people will have their answer without asking in the forum.
In the future, I guess that I will have to revert back to gcc according to new linux distribution versions.

If you still want to remove upp-devel.spec than, well, does it really matter? If it's broken, at least rpm packagers will have something to start from. If you remove it, most people will use the standard 'make' procedure.

Is there a team responsible for U++ packaging? I would like to discuss automatic building on debian and other linux/bsd based distributions.
For example, the 'debian' file in root need to be renamed. Something like 'buildrequires.debian'. This 'debian' file prevents me from building a standard debian package because those packages need to have a debian directory with several files within...

[Updated on: Wed, 04 January 2017 01:12]

Report message to a moderator

Send a private message to this user

[Message index]

		U++ 2017 beta By: mirek on Thu, 22 December 2016 09:25
		Re: U++ 2017 beta By: MrSarup on Thu, 22 December 2016 20:25
		Re: U++ 2017 beta By: mirek on Thu, 22 December 2016 23:00
		Re: U++ 2017 beta By: MrSarup on Sun, 25 December 2016 08:02
		Re: U++ 2017 beta By: Klugier on Sun, 25 December 2016 21:29
		Re: U++ 2017 beta By: omari on Mon, 26 December 2016 13:36
		Re: U++ 2017 beta By: mr_ped on Fri, 23 December 2016 04:02
		Re: U++ 2017 beta By: koldo on Fri, 23 December 2016 10:28
		Re: U++ 2017 beta By: MrSarup on Sun, 25 December 2016 09:23
		Re: U++ 2017 beta By: MrSarup on Sun, 25 December 2016 09:52
		Re: U++ 2017 beta By: mirek on Sun, 25 December 2016 10:02
		Re: U++ 2017 beta By: mirek on Sun, 25 December 2016 09:52
		Re: U++ 2017 beta By: MrSarup on Sun, 25 December 2016 11:24
		Re: U++ 2017 beta By: cbpporter on Sun, 25 December 2016 12:18
		Re: U++ 2017 beta By: mirek on Sun, 01 January 2017 21:51
		Re: U++ 2017 beta By: cbpporter on Wed, 28 December 2016 13:01
		Re: U++ 2017 beta By: MrSarup on Wed, 28 December 2016 13:31
		Re: U++ 2017 beta By: mirek on Wed, 28 December 2016 16:53
		Re: U++ 2017 beta By: cbpporter on Wed, 28 December 2016 19:40
		Re: U++ 2017 beta By: MrSarup on Wed, 28 December 2016 20:53
		Re: U++ 2017 beta By: Mindtraveller on Wed, 28 December 2016 23:12
		Re: U++ 2017 beta By: Klugier on Wed, 28 December 2016 23:15
		Re: U++ 2017 beta By: amrein on Thu, 29 December 2016 08:44
		Re: U++ 2017 beta By: mirek on Sun, 01 January 2017 21:54
		Re: U++ 2017 beta By: mirek on Sun, 01 January 2017 22:03
		Re: U++ 2017 beta By: MrSarup on Mon, 02 January 2017 06:09
		Re: U++ 2017 beta By: mirek on Mon, 02 January 2017 22:31
		Re: U++ 2017 beta By: mirek on Mon, 02 January 2017 21:42
		Re: U++ 2017 beta By: cbpporter on Tue, 03 January 2017 11:21
		Re: U++ 2017 beta By: amrein on Tue, 03 January 2017 14:22
		Re: U++ 2017 beta By: mirek on Tue, 03 January 2017 14:59
		Re: U++ 2017 beta By: amrein on Wed, 04 January 2017 01:04
		Re: U++ 2017 beta By: MrSarup on Wed, 04 January 2017 07:28
		Re: U++ 2017 beta By: mirek on Wed, 04 January 2017 07:59
		Re: U++ 2017 beta By: mirek on Wed, 04 January 2017 08:03
		Re: U++ 2017 beta By: cbpporter on Wed, 04 January 2017 08:08
		Re: U++ 2017 beta By: MrSarup on Wed, 04 January 2017 08:47
		Re: U++ 2017 beta By: MrSarup on Wed, 04 January 2017 09:00
		Re: U++ 2017 beta By: cbpporter on Wed, 04 January 2017 10:06
		Re: U++ 2017 beta By: mirek on Wed, 04 January 2017 10:28
		Re: U++ 2017 beta By: cbpporter on Wed, 04 January 2017 11:19
		Re: U++ 2017 beta By: Tom1 on Wed, 04 January 2017 12:32
		Re: U++ 2017 beta By: mirek on Wed, 04 January 2017 12:38
		Re: U++ 2017 beta By: Tom1 on Wed, 04 January 2017 13:20
		Re: U++ 2017 beta By: cbpporter on Wed, 04 January 2017 14:02
		Re: U++ 2017 beta By: mirek on Wed, 04 January 2017 14:39
		Re: U++ 2017 beta By: Tom1 on Wed, 04 January 2017 15:29
		Re: U++ 2017 beta By: mirek on Thu, 05 January 2017 08:38
		Re: U++ 2017 beta By: Tom1 on Thu, 05 January 2017 09:17
		Re: U++ 2017 beta By: mirek on Wed, 04 January 2017 14:49
		Re: U++ 2017 beta By: cbpporter on Wed, 04 January 2017 15:38
		Re: U++ 2017 beta By: mirek on Wed, 04 January 2017 15:47
		Re: U++ 2017 beta By: Klugier on Wed, 04 January 2017 22:32
		Re: U++ 2017 beta By: mirek on Thu, 05 January 2017 08:23
		Re: U++ 2017 beta By: mr_ped on Thu, 05 January 2017 05:01
		Re: U++ 2017 beta By: mirek on Thu, 05 January 2017 08:20

Previous Topic:	upp-10502-winxp32-compiled
Next Topic:	On-line meeting before 2017 release

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

PDF

]

Current Time: Sun May 05 06:39:51 CEST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.02801 seconds