Zbigniew Rebacz's activity
From 01/04/2017 to 02/02/2017
01/29/2017
- 09:21 PM U++ Feature #1627 (Approved): Provide Google Mocks on bazzar
- Now, bazzar has got google tests, but mocks are missing. This should change...
01/28/2017
- 08:22 PM U++ Bug #1624 (Approved): Justify cannot be reverted in RichEdit (Topic++)
- How to reproduce?
1. Open for example: ide/app.tpp/AndroidBuilder$en...
2. Change text align to left from justficia... - 07:34 PM U++ Bug #1623 (New): Resolve problem with Android build method name and compilation flag
- As I notice we passed build method as flag to the build process. The same we do with cross compilation flag. The main...
01/25/2017
- 11:53 PM U++ Feature #1329 (Rejected): ide: Number of columns could be per-file setting (just like tabs)
- Duplicates - #1323 we don't need this in actual feature list.
- 11:53 PM U++ Feature #1329 (Rejected): ide: Number of columns could be per-file setting (just like tabs)
- Duplicates - #1323 we don't need this in actual feature list.
- 11:49 PM U++ Feature #1417 (Approved): Find File array can display file icons
- Fixed.
- 11:49 PM U++ Feature #1417 (Approved): Find File array can display file icons
- Fixed.
- 11:48 PM U++ Task #1526 (Rejected): Consider chaning Find File default shortcut
- Can be close due to key configuration setup.
- 11:48 PM U++ Task #1526 (Rejected): Consider chaning Find File default shortcut
- Can be close due to key configuration setup.
- 11:47 PM U++ Task #74 (Approved): create official GIT repository alongside upp-mirror
- I am closing this, due to movement to GitHub.
- 11:47 PM U++ Task #74 (Approved): create official GIT repository alongside upp-mirror
- I am closing this, due to movement to GitHub.
- 07:02 PM U++ Bug #1617 (In Progress): Double fields by transmission to the program lose a fractional part
- 06:40 PM U++ Bug #1617 (Rejected): Double fields by transmission to the program lose a fractional part
- 11:43 AM U++ Bug #1617 (In Progress): Double fields by transmission to the program lose a fractional part
01/23/2017
- 09:43 PM U++ Task #1591: Update toolchain on windows
- It is still actual. We should update bundled tool-chain on MS Windows.
- 09:36 AM U++ Bug #1617 (Approved): Double fields by transmission to the program lose a fractional part
- http://www.ultimatepp.org/forums/index.php?t=msg&goto=47491&#msg_47491
01/21/2017
- 10:28 PM U++ Bug #1371: assist++ not working
- The description of this problem is too enigmatic. Can you post at least code sample.
- 10:20 PM U++ Feature #1381 (Approved): glib-2.0 and gtk.2.0 arm-linux-gnueabihf can be included by default for...
- Compiles fine on Rasberry Pi. With multi-threading compilation, the whole process is super fast.
- 10:20 PM U++ Feature #1381 (Approved): glib-2.0 and gtk.2.0 arm-linux-gnueabihf can be included by default for...
- Compiles fine on Rasberry Pi. With multi-threading compilation, the whole process is super fast.
01/20/2017
- 10:37 PM U++ Feature #1616 (Approved): RichText should support content feature
- Currently, we have problem in our documentation that we have too long pages and navigation is hard. For example on on...
- 10:08 PM U++ Bug #1594: Can't compile U++ on most Linux distributions
- I don't see you in Assignee field also. I will check tomorrow if everything is correct. Then I will let you know what...
- 09:47 PM U++ Bug #1594 (Approved): Can't compile U++ on most Linux distributions
- OK - Approved for the next time - please remember to address this readmine to me "Assignee" field and change status t...
- 09:47 PM U++ Bug #1594 (Approved): Can't compile U++ on most Linux distributions
- OK - Approved for the next time - please remember to address this readmine to me "Assignee" field and change status t...
- 10:05 PM U++ Feature #1381: glib-2.0 and gtk.2.0 arm-linux-gnueabihf can be included by default for GCC.bm and...
- Haha ;) I am trying to do that 11 months ago - right I don't test it, but I believe it is not. For the whole U++ it w...
01/16/2017
- 11:58 AM U++ Bug #1609 (In Progress): CodeEditor dosen't highlight unsigned numbers
- I think I found bug in current implementation - highlight doesn't work for following code...
- 11:58 AM U++ Bug #1609 (In Progress): CodeEditor dosen't highlight unsigned numbers
- I think I found bug in current implementation - highlight doesn't work for following code...
01/15/2017
- 05:38 PM U++ Bug #1609: CodeEditor dosen't highlight unsigned numbers
- This is not candidate for 2017.1 ;)
01/07/2017
- 11:37 PM U++ Task #1610 (Approved): Solve flag problems in Android Builder
- Right now U++ is not ready for support truly cross compilation build methods....
01/06/2017
- 10:57 PM U++ Bug #1609 (Approved): CodeEditor dosen't highlight unsigned numbers
- Hard-coded unsigned values for example 0u is not highlighted....
Also available in: Atom